City wants to plant a replacement tree 2 YEARS after removal
I'm old enough to have experienced plenty of ridiculousness from city offices, but this might take the cake. A couple of days ago, we received this City Tree Planting Notice: Nothing too unusual there, you might think. The Urban Forestry Division of our great town removed one city tree on our property and will replace it with another. Except look at the date of the letter: September 23, 2021. The tree that started all this—a Bradford pear, arguably one of the nastiest and trashiest trees ever to torture this planet—was removed by the selfsame Urban Forestry Division on October 24, 2019. That was 706 days—or 1 year, 11 months, 5 days—ago. October 24, 2019, the last morning we had to tolerate this Bradford pear. It was removed later that day. October 25, 2019, the day after the Bradford pear had been removed. (The Asian lemon bamboo to the left of it is now gone, too—cut down by yours truly to let in more light.) Granted, a year and a half of the last two years have been anything bu